Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

HP - OMEN 32q QHD vs Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE

Last updated · How Mars Score works
OMEN 32q QHDHPRENDER
Probe A
HP
OMEN 32q QHD
69.4/ 100B
Performance77· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
UltraSharp U3225QEDELLRENDER
Probe B
Dell
UltraSharp U3225QE
65.3/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the OMEN 32q QHD and UltraSharp U3225QE, the OMEN 32q QHD comes out ahead in response time (gtg) and refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on peak brightness and dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the OMEN 32q QHD scores 69.4 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The OMEN 32q QHD edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.4 vs 65.3), but the 4.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the OMEN 32q QHD if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are response time (gtg), refresh rate, screen size, among others.

Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, dci-p3 coverage, usb-c power delivery.

Both ship with comparable panel type, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why HP - OMEN 32q QHD wins

  • Response time (GtG) — 80.00% less. 1 ms vs 5 ms.
  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
  • Has G-Sync.
  • Has FreeSync.

Why Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE wins

  • Peak brightness — 12.50% more. 450 nits vs 400 nits.
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 4.21% more. 99 % vs 95 %.
  • USB-C Power Delivery: 140 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecHP - OMEN 32q QHDDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Screen size32 "lead31.5 "
Panel typeIPSIPS
Resolution1440p4Klead
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecHP - OMEN 32q QHDDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Response time (GtG)1 mslead5 ms
Peak brightness400 nits450 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverage95 %99 %lead
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctrueleadfalse
FreeSynctrueleadfalse

Connectivity

SpecHP - OMEN 32q QHDDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputfalsetruelead
USB-C Power Delivery0 W140 Wlead
KVMfalsetruelead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, OMEN 32q QHD or UltraSharp U3225QE?+

OMEN 32q QHD refreshes at 165Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, OMEN 32q QHD or UltraSharp U3225QE?+

OMEN 32q QHD responds in 1ms vs 5ms.

Does OMEN 32q QHD or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+

UltraSharp U3225QE offers USB-C with 140W power delivery.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.