Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

MSI - MPG 321URX vs LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B

Last updated · How Mars Score works
MPG 321URXMSIRENDER
Probe A
MSI
MPG 321URX
73.2/ 100B
Performance84· 45%
Panel61· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
UltraGear 32GS95UE-BLGRENDER
Probe B
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the MPG 321URX and UltraGear 32GS95UE-B, the MPG 321URX comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and screen size, while the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins on peak brightness. Overall, the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 and the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 72.5). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage, among others.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins

  • USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
  • Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
  • DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
  • Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins

  • Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecMSI - MPG 321URXLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
Screen size32 "lead31.5 "
Panel typeQD-OLEDleadOLED
Resolution4K4K
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curvedfalsefalse

Performance

SpecMSI - MPG 321URXLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightness1000 nits1300 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverage99 %lead98.5 %
HDRtruetrue
G-Synctruetrue
FreeSynctruetrue

Connectivity

SpecMSI - MPG 321URXLG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
HDMI ports22
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Delivery98 Wlead65 W
KVMtrueleadfalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, MPG 321URX or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.

Which has faster response time, MPG 321URX or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.

Does MPG 321URX or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 98W on MPG 321URX, 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.