vsMars
直接対決

ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDM vs Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE

最終更新 · マーズスコアの仕組み
ROG Swift PG34WCDMASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
ROG Swift PG34WCDM
75.1/ 100B
Performance84· 45%
Panel65· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
UltraSharp U3225QEDELLRENDER
Probe B
Dell
UltraSharp U3225QE
65.3/ 100C
Performance70· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
クイック判定

Between the ROG Swift PG34WCDM and UltraSharp U3225QE, the ROG Swift PG34WCDM comes out ahead in peak brightness and refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the ROG Swift PG34WCDM scores 75.1 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.

購入アドバイス

どちらを買うべき?

The ROG Swift PG34WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.8 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the ROG Swift PG34WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.

Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.

Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG34WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

ASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDMが勝つ理由

  • ▲Peak brightness — 188.89% more. 1300 nits vs 450 nits.
  • ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
  • ▲Screen size — 7.94% more. 34 " vs 31.5 ".
  • ▲Has G-Sync.
  • ▲Has FreeSync.
  • ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).

Dell - UltraSharp U3225QEが勝つ理由

  • ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 55.56% more. 140 W vs 90 W.
全データ

スペック比較

Panel

スペックASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDMDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Screen sizeⓘ34 "lead31.5 "
Panel typeⓘQD-OLEDleadIPS
Resolutionⓘ1440p4Klead
Aspect ratioⓘ21:916:9
Curvedⓘtrueleadfalse

Performance

スペックASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDMDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
Refresh rateⓘ240 Hzlead120 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.03 mslead5 ms
Peak brightnessⓘ1300 nitslead450 nits
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ99 %99 %
HDRⓘtruetrue
G-Syncⓘtrueleadfalse
FreeSyncⓘtrueleadfalse

Connectivity

スペックASUS - ROG Swift PG34WCDMDell - UltraSharp U3225QE
HDMI ports2lead1
DisplayPort ports11
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ90 W140 Wlead
KVMtruetrue
読者からの質問

よくある質問

Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG34WCDM or UltraSharp U3225QE?+

ROG Swift PG34WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.

Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG34WCDM or UltraSharp U3225QE?+

ROG Swift PG34WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.

Does ROG Swift PG34WCDM or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG34WCDM, 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.

深掘り

スペック詳細分析

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Aspect ratio→Curved→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→Peak brightness→DCI-P3 coverage→HDR→G-Sync→FreeSync→
メーカー別

同じブランドの他の製品

ASUS →4
Dell →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.