vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) vs LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Studio Display (Nano-textu…APPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
Studio Display (Nano-texture)
56.1/ 100D
Performance62· 45%
Panel49· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
UltraGear 32GS95UE-BLGRENDER
Probe B
LG
UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
72.5/ 100B
Performance83· 45%
Panel60· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Quick verdict

Between the Studio Display (Nano-texture) and UltraGear 32GS95UE-B, the Studio Display (Nano-texture) comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and dci-p3 coverage, while the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins on refresh rate and peak brightness. Overall, the Studio Display (Nano-texture) scores 56.1 and the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The UltraGear 32GS95UE-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Studio Display (Nano-texture) if you care most about usb-c power delivery and dci-p3 coverage. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, dci-p3 coverage.

Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins

  • ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
  • ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.

Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B wins

  • ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • ▲Peak brightness — 116.67% more. 1300 nits vs 600 nits.
  • ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.63% less. 0.03 ms vs 8 ms.
  • ▲Screen size — 16.67% more. 31.5 " vs 27 ".
  • ▲Has G-Sync.
  • ▲Has FreeSync.
  • ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecApple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
Screen sizeⓘ27 "31.5 "lead
Panel typeⓘIPSOLEDlead
Resolutionⓘ5Klead4K
Aspect ratioⓘ16:916:9
Curvedⓘfalsefalse

Performance

SpecApple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
Refresh rateⓘ60 Hz240 Hzlead
Response time (GtG)ⓘ8 ms0.03 mslead
Peak brightnessⓘ600 nits1300 nitslead
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ99 %lead98.5 %
HDRⓘfalsetruelead
G-Syncⓘfalsetruelead
FreeSyncⓘfalsetruelead

Connectivity

SpecApple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B
HDMI ports02lead
DisplayPort ports01lead
USB-C inputtruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ96 Wlead65 W
KVMfalsefalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has higher refresh rate, Studio Display (Nano-texture) or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.

Which has faster response time, Studio Display (Nano-texture) or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B?+

UltraGear 32GS95UE-B responds in 0.03ms vs 8ms.

Does Studio Display (Nano-texture) or UltraGear 32GS95UE-B have USB-C with power delivery?+

Both offer USB-C PD — 96W on Studio Display (Nano-texture), 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Aspect ratio→Curved→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→Peak brightness→DCI-P3 coverage→HDR→G-Sync→FreeSync→
By manufacturer

More from the same brands

Apple →4
LG →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.