Between the Predator X32 X3 and UltraSharp U3225QE, the Predator X32 X3 comes out ahead in peak brightness and refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U3225QE wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the Predator X32 X3 scores 73.2 and the UltraSharp U3225QE scores 65.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Predator X32 X3 edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.2 vs 65.3), but the 7.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Predator X32 X3 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
Pick the UltraSharp U3225QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
Both ship with comparable dci-p3 coverage, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Predator X32 X3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Acer - Predator X32 X3 wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Why Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 55.56% more. 140 W vs 90 W.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 450 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 % | 99 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | Dell - UltraSharp U3225QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
Predator X32 X3 refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U3225QE?+
Predator X32 X3 responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Predator X32 X3 or UltraSharp U3225QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on Predator X32 X3, 140W on UltraSharp U3225QE.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.