Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and Z27k G3 4K USB-C, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in refresh rate and peak brightness, while the Z27k G3 4K USB-C wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the Z27k G3 4K USB-C scores 59 on our Mars Score.
어느 것을 사야 할까요?
The ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 20.8 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
Pick the Z27k G3 4K USB-C if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 225.00% more. 1300 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 44.44% more. 39 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
HP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 11.11% more. 100 W vs 90 W.
사양 비교
Panel
| 사양 | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | HP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 39 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 1440p | 4Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| 사양 | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | HP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1300 nitslead | 400 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| 사양 | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | HP - Z27k G3 4K USB-C |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | 100 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
자주 묻는 질문
Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or Z27k G3 4K USB-C?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or Z27k G3 4K USB-C?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or Z27k G3 4K USB-C have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 100W on Z27k G3 4K USB-C.
사양별 심층 분석
같은 브랜드의 더 보기
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.