Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P vs LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B
Between the AORUS FO32U2P and UltraGear 45GX950A-B, the AORUS FO32U2P comes out ahead in refresh rate and dci-p3 coverage, while the UltraGear 45GX950A-B wins on screen size and usb-c power delivery. Overall, the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 and the UltraGear 45GX950A-B scores 83.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, dci-p3 coverage, panel type.
Pick the UltraGear 45GX950A-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are screen size, usb-c power delivery, peak brightness.
Both ship with comparable response time (gtg), g-sync, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the UltraGear 45GX950A-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 45.45% more. 240 Hz vs 165 Hz.
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Why LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B wins
- ▲Screen size — 40.63% more. 45 " vs 32 ".
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 " | 45 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | OLED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 5Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | truelead |
Performance
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 165 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nits | 1300 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98.5 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P | LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 2lead | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 90 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 45GX950A-B?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 165Hz.
Which has faster response time, AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 45GX950A-B?+
UltraGear 45GX950A-B responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does AORUS FO32U2P or UltraGear 45GX950A-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on AORUS FO32U2P, 90W on UltraGear 45GX950A-B.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.