Between the UltraGear 27GP950-B and MPG 321URX, the UltraGear 27GP950-B comes out ahead in several specs, while the MPG 321URX wins on response time (gtg) and peak brightness. Overall, the UltraGear 27GP950-B scores 78.2 and the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UltraGear 27GP950-B edges ahead on the Mars Score (78.2 vs 73.2), but the 5.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The UltraGear 27GP950-B doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are response time (gtg), peak brightness, refresh rate, among others.
Both ship with comparable g-sync, freesync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the UltraGear 27GP950-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 97.00% less. 0.03 ms vs 1 ms.
- ▲Peak brightness — 66.67% more. 1000 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 50.00% more. 240 Hz vs 160 Hz.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 32 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 160 Hz | 240 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 1 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 600 nits | 1000 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | false | truelead |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | — | 98 W |
| KVM | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 27GP950-B or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 160Hz.
Which has faster response time, UltraGear 27GP950-B or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 1ms.
Does UltraGear 27GP950-B or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+
MPG 321URX offers USB-C with 98W power delivery.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.