Between the Quest 3 and Quest 3S, the Quest 3 comes out ahead in field of view, while the Quest 3S wins on several specs. Overall, the Quest 3 scores 72.9 and the Quest 3S scores 63 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Quest 3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Quest 3 if you care most about field of view. The biggest gaps in its favor are field of view.
The Quest 3S similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, standalone, eye tracking, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Quest 3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Meta - Quest 3 wins
- ▲Field of view — 14.58% more. 110 ° vs 96 °.
Why Meta - Quest 3S wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Meta - Quest 3 | Meta - Quest 3S |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 2064x2208 | 1832x1920 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Field of view | 110 °lead | 96 ° |
| Panelⓘ | LCD | LCD |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | Meta - Quest 3 | Meta - Quest 3S |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | false | false |
| Face tracking | false | false |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | Meta - Quest 3 | Meta - Quest 3S |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | true | true |
| Battery | 2.2 h | 2.5 hlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.