Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro vs Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer)
Between the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro and Hi·Print 2 (Printer), the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro comes out ahead in film format, while the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) wins on several specs. Overall, the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro scores 83 and the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) scores 95 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Hi·Print 2 (Printer) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro if you care most about film format. The biggest gaps in its favor are film format.
The Hi·Print 2 (Printer) similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable hybrid (digital + print), double exposure, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro wins
- ▲Film format: ZINK (vs Hi-Print).
Why Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | ZINKlead | Hi-Print |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | true | true |
Features
| Spec | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | truelead | false |
| Double exposure | false | false |
| Lens count | 1lead | 0 |
Design
| Spec | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 365 g | 230 glead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.