Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro vs Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | ZINK | Hi-Print |
Between the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro and Hi·Print 2 (Printer), the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro comes out ahead in film format, while the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) wins on several specs. Overall, the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro scores 83 and the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) scores 95 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Hi·Print 2 (Printer) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro if you care most about film format. The biggest gaps in its favor are film format. The single most decisive one: Film format: ZINK (vs Hi-Print).
The Hi·Print 2 (Printer) similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable hybrid (digital + print), double exposure, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro or Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer)?
Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) leads the current Mars Score by 12.0 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare film format against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro if…
Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro has the measurable edge on film format.
Choose Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) if…
Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro wins
- ▲Film format: ZINK (vs Hi-Print).
Why Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | ZINKlead | Hi-Print |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | true | true |
Features
| Spec | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | truelead | false |
| Double exposure | false | false |
| Lens count | 1lead | 0 |
Design
| Spec | Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 365 g | 230 glead |