Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro vs Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Mini Shot 3 Square RetroKODAKILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Kodak
Mini Shot 3 Square Retro
83.0/ 100A
Film· 50%
Features· 30%
Design83· 20%
Now+ Generation 2POLAROIDILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Polaroid
Now+ Generation 2
73.1/ 100B
Film· 50%
Features· 30%
Design73· 20%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecKodak - Mini Shot 3 Square RetroPolaroid - Now+ Generation 2
Hybrid (digital + print)truefalse
Double exposurefalsetrue
Film formatZINKPolaroid i-Type
Quick verdict

Between the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro and Now+ Generation 2, the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro comes out ahead in hybrid (digital + print) / film format, while the Now+ Generation 2 wins on double exposure. Overall, the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro scores 83 and the Now+ Generation 2 scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Mini Shot 3 Square Retro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro if you care most about hybrid (digital + print) / film format. The biggest gaps in its favor are hybrid (digital + print), film format. The single most decisive one: Has Hybrid (digital + print).

Pick the Now+ Generation 2 if you care most about double exposure. Its strongest claims are double exposure. The single most decisive one: Has Double exposure.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the Mini Shot 3 Square Retro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro or Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2?

Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro leads the current Mars Score by 9.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare film format, hybrid (digital + print), double exposure against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro if…

Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro has the measurable edge on is hybrid, film format.

Choose Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2 if…

Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2 has the measurable edge on has double exposure.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Kodak - Mini Shot 3 Square Retro wins

  • Has Hybrid (digital + print).
  • Film format: ZINK (vs Polaroid i-Type).

Why Polaroid - Now+ Generation 2 wins

  • Has Double exposure.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Film

SpecKodak - Mini Shot 3 Square RetroPolaroid - Now+ Generation 2
Film formatZINKleadPolaroid i-Type
Hybrid (digital + print)trueleadfalse

Features

SpecKodak - Mini Shot 3 Square RetroPolaroid - Now+ Generation 2
Selfie mirrortruetrue
Double exposurefalsetruelead
Lens count12lead

Design

SpecKodak - Mini Shot 3 Square RetroPolaroid - Now+ Generation 2
Weight365 glead457 g
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands