Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000 | 26000 |
| Battery | 80 h | 70 h |
| Weight | 47 g | 52 g |
Between the Maya X and X2V2 Mini, the Maya X comes out ahead in max dpi / battery, while the X2V2 Mini wins on several specs. Overall, the Maya X scores 77.7 and the X2V2 Mini scores 75.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (77.7 vs 75.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Maya X if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi, battery, weight. The single most decisive one: Max DPI — 15.38% more. 30000 vs 26000.
The X2V2 Mini similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, wireless, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Lamzu - Maya X or Pulsar - X2V2 Mini?
Lamzu - Maya X leads the current Mars Score by 1.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Lamzu - Maya X if…
Lamzu - Maya X has the measurable edge on max dpi, battery h, weight g.
Choose Pulsar - X2V2 Mini if…
Pulsar - X2V2 Mini does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Lamzu - Maya X wins
- ▲Max DPI — 15.38% more. 30000 vs 26000.
- ▲Battery — 14.29% more. 80 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Weight — 5.00 g less. 47 vs 52.
Why Pulsar - X2V2 Mini wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000lead | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 750lead | 650 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 47 glead | 52 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 80 hlead | 70 h |