Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 80 h | 120 h |
| Weight | 47 g | 55 g |
| Max DPI | 30000 | 32000 |
Between the Maya X and X2V3, the Maya X comes out ahead in weight, while the X2V3 wins on battery / max dpi. Overall, the Maya X scores 77.7 and the X2V3 scores 77 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (77.7 vs 77). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Maya X if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 8.00 g less. 47 vs 55.
Pick the X2V3 if you care most about battery / max dpi. Its strongest claims are battery, max dpi. The single most decisive one: Battery — 50.00% more. 120 h vs 80 h.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, wireless, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Lamzu - Maya X or Pulsar - X2V3?
Lamzu - Maya X leads the current Mars Score by 0.7 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Lamzu - Maya X if…
Lamzu - Maya X has the measurable edge on weight g.
Choose Pulsar - X2V3 if…
Pulsar - X2V3 has the measurable edge on battery h, max dpi.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Lamzu - Maya X wins
- ▲Weight — 8.00 g less. 47 vs 55.
Why Pulsar - X2V3 wins
- ▲Battery — 50.00% more. 120 h vs 80 h.
- ▲Max DPI — 6.67% more. 32000 vs 30000.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000 | 32000lead |
| Max IPS | 750 | 750 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 47 glead | 55 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 80 h | 120 hlead |