Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | BenQ - EC1-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000 | 3200 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 1000 Hz |
| Weight | 47 g | 77 g |
| Battery | 80 h | 70 h |
| Buttons | 6 | 5 |
Between the Maya X and EC1-CW, the Maya X comes out ahead in max dpi / polling rate, while the EC1-CW wins on several specs. Overall, the Maya X scores 77.7 and the EC1-CW scores 50.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Maya X is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 27.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Maya X if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi, polling rate, weight, among others. The single most decisive one: Max DPI — 837.50% more. 30000 vs 3200.
The EC1-CW similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable wireless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Maya X is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Lamzu - Maya X or BenQ - EC1-CW?
Lamzu - Maya X leads the current Mars Score by 27.0 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, polling rate, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Lamzu - Maya X if…
Lamzu - Maya X has the measurable edge on max dpi, polling rate hz, weight g.
Choose BenQ - EC1-CW if…
BenQ - EC1-CW does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Lamzu - Maya X wins
- ▲Max DPI — 837.50% more. 30000 vs 3200.
- ▲Polling rate — 700.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 30.00 g less. 47 vs 77.
- ▲Battery — 14.29% more. 80 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Buttons — 1.00 more. 6 vs 5.
Why BenQ - EC1-CW wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | BenQ - EC1-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000lead | 3200 |
| Max IPS | 750lead | 400 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hzlead | 1000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | BenQ - EC1-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 47 glead | 77 g |
| Buttons | 6lead | 5 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Right-handed |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Maya X | BenQ - EC1-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 80 hlead | 70 h |