Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 2000 Hz |
| Battery | 80 h | 95 h |
| Weight | 52 g | 60 g |
| Max DPI | 30000 | 32000 |
| Buttons | 6 | 5 |
Between the Thorn and G Pro X Superlight 2, the Thorn comes out ahead in polling rate / weight, while the G Pro X Superlight 2 wins on battery / max dpi. Overall, the Thorn scores 70.5 and the G Pro X Superlight 2 scores 66.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Thorn edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.5 vs 66.3), but the 4.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Thorn if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are polling rate, weight, buttons. The single most decisive one: Polling rate — 100.00% more. 4000 Hz vs 2000 Hz.
Pick the G Pro X Superlight 2 if you care most about battery / max dpi. Its strongest claims are battery, max dpi. The single most decisive one: Battery — 18.75% more. 95 h vs 80 h.
Both ship with comparable wireless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Lamzu - Thorn or Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2?
Lamzu - Thorn leads the current Mars Score by 4.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, polling rate, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Lamzu - Thorn if…
Lamzu - Thorn has the measurable edge on polling rate hz, weight g, button count.
Choose Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 if…
Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 has the measurable edge on battery h, max dpi.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Lamzu - Thorn wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 4000 Hz vs 2000 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 8.00 g less. 52 vs 60.
- ▲Buttons — 1.00 more. 6 vs 5.
Why Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 wins
- ▲Battery — 18.75% more. 95 h vs 80 h.
- ▲Max DPI — 6.67% more. 32000 vs 30000.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000 | 32000lead |
| Max IPS | 750lead | 500 |
| Polling rate | 4000 Hzlead | 2000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 52 glead | 60 g |
| Buttons | 6lead | 5 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Logitech - G Pro X Superlight 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 80 h | 95 hlead |