Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
| Battery | 80 h | 70 h |
| Max DPI | 30000 | 32000 |
| Weight | 52 g | 53 g |
Between the Thorn and X2H Mini, the Thorn comes out ahead in battery / weight, while the X2H Mini wins on polling rate / max dpi. Overall, the Thorn scores 70.5 and the X2H Mini scores 77 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2H Mini edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.5 vs 77), but the 6.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Thorn if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight. The single most decisive one: Battery — 14.29% more. 80 h vs 70 h.
Pick the X2H Mini if you care most about polling rate / max dpi. Its strongest claims are polling rate, max dpi. The single most decisive one: Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Both ship with comparable wireless, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X2H Mini is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Lamzu - Thorn or Pulsar - X2H Mini?
Pulsar - X2H Mini leads the current Mars Score by 6.5 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, polling rate, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Lamzu - Thorn if…
Lamzu - Thorn has the measurable edge on battery h, weight g.
Choose Pulsar - X2H Mini if…
Pulsar - X2H Mini has the measurable edge on polling rate hz, max dpi.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Lamzu - Thorn wins
- ▲Battery — 14.29% more. 80 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 g less. 52 vs 53.
Why Pulsar - X2H Mini wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
- ▲Max DPI — 6.67% more. 32000 vs 30000.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000 | 32000lead |
| Max IPS | 750 | 750 |
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 52 glead | 53 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Lamzu - Thorn | Pulsar - X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 80 hlead | 70 h |