Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass vs Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Double exposure | true | false |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | false | true |
| Film format | Instax mini | Hi-Print |
Between the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass and Hi·Print 2 (Printer), the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass comes out ahead in double exposure, while the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) wins on hybrid (digital + print) / film format. Overall, the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass scores 75 and the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) scores 95 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Hi·Print 2 (Printer) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 20.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Lomo'Instant Automat Glass if you care most about double exposure. The biggest gaps in its favor are double exposure. The single most decisive one: Has Double exposure.
Pick the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) if you care most about hybrid (digital + print) / film format. Its strongest claims are hybrid (digital + print), film format. The single most decisive one: Has Hybrid (digital + print).
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Hi·Print 2 (Printer) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass or Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer)?
Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) leads the current Mars Score by 20.0 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare film format, hybrid (digital + print), double exposure against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass if…
Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass has the measurable edge on has double exposure.
Choose Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) if…
Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) has the measurable edge on is hybrid, film format.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass wins
- ▲Has Double exposure.
Why Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) wins
- ▲Has Hybrid (digital + print).
- ▲Film format: Hi-Print (vs Instax mini).
Spec comparison
Film
| Spec | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Film format | Instax mini | Hi-Printlead |
| Hybrid (digital + print) | false | truelead |
Features
| Spec | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Selfie mirror | truelead | false |
| Double exposure | truelead | false |
| Lens count | 3lead | 0 |
Design
| Spec | Lomography - Lomo'Instant Automat Glass | Polaroid - Hi·Print 2 (Printer) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 440 g | 230 glead |