Between the Blessing 3 and IE 200, the Blessing 3 comes out ahead in driver count and impedance, while the IE 200 wins on sensitivity. Overall, the Blessing 3 scores 68.3 and the IE 200 scores 62.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Blessing 3 edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.3 vs 62.5), but the 5.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Blessing 3 if you care most about driver count and impedance. The biggest gaps in its favor are driver count, impedance.
Pick the IE 200 if you care most about sensitivity. Its strongest claims are sensitivity.
Both ship with comparable detachable cable, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Blessing 3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Moondrop - Blessing 3 wins
- ▲Driver count — 4.00 more. 5 vs 1.
- ▲Impedance — 3.00 Ω less. 15 vs 18.
Why Sennheiser - IE 200 wins
- ▲Sensitivity — 1.71% more. 119 dB vs 117 dB.
Spec comparison
Drivers
| Spec | Moondrop - Blessing 3 | Sennheiser - IE 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Driver count | 5lead | 1 |
| Driver types | 1DD + 4BA Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Impedanceⓘ | 15 Ωlead | 18 Ω |
| Sensitivityⓘ | 117 dB | 119 dBlead |
Build
| Spec | Moondrop - Blessing 3 | Sennheiser - IE 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Detachable cable | true | true |
| Connector | 2-pinlead | MMCX |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.