Between the Razr 50 Ultra and Phone (2), the Razr 50 Ultra comes out ahead in refresh rate / antutu, while the Phone (2) wins on battery capacity. Overall, the Razr 50 Ultra scores 65.6 and the Phone (2) scores 64.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (65.6 vs 64.5). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Razr 50 Ultra if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, antutu, weight, among others.
Pick the Phone (2) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are battery capacity.
Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, 5g support, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲AnTuTu — 24.81% more. 1610000 vs 1290000.
- ▲Weight — 12.20 g less. 189 vs 201.2.
- ▲Pixel density — 4.82% more. 413 ppi vs 394 ppi.
- ▲Screen size — 2.99% more. 6.9 " vs 6.7 ".
- ▲Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP54).
Why Nothing - Phone (2) wins
- ▲Battery capacity — 17.50% more. 4700 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 glead | 201.2 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mmlead | 8.6 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX8lead | IP54 |
| Form factor | foldable_clamshelllead | bar |
Display
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 "lead | 6.7 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 413 ppilead | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nitslead | 1600 nits |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4000 mAh | 4700 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 15 W |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (2) |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 3 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Razr 50 Ultra or Phone (2)?+
Phone (2) has 17.5% more battery — 4000 mAh vs 4700 mAh.
Which is lighter, Razr 50 Ultra or Phone (2)?+
Razr 50 Ultra is 12g lighter — 189g vs 201.2g.
Is Razr 50 Ultra waterproof?+
Razr 50 Ultra has an IPX8 rating.
Does Phone (2) support 5G?+
Yes, Phone (2) supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, Razr 50 Ultra or Phone (2)?+
Phone (2) has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.