Between the Razr 50 Ultra and Phone (3a) Pro, the Razr 50 Ultra comes out ahead in antutu / refresh rate, while the Phone (3a) Pro wins on front camera / battery capacity. Overall, the Razr 50 Ultra scores 65.6 and the Phone (3a) Pro scores 63.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (65.6 vs 63.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Razr 50 Ultra if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are antutu, refresh rate, weight, among others.
Pick the Phone (3a) Pro if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are front camera, battery capacity, wired charging.
Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, 5g support, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra wins
- ▲AnTuTu — 89.41% more. 1610000 vs 850000.
- ▲Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 22.00 g less. 189 vs 211.
- ▲Pixel density — 6.72% more. 413 ppi vs 387 ppi.
- ▲Screen size — 1.92% more. 6.9 " vs 6.77 ".
- ▲Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP64).
- ▲Wireless charging: 15 W vs 0 W.
Why Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro wins
- ▲Front camera — 56.25% more. 50 MP vs 32 MP.
- ▲Battery capacity — 25.00% more. 5000 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
- ▲Wired charging — 11.11% more. 50 W vs 45 W.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 glead | 211 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mmlead | 8.4 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX8lead | IP64 |
| Form factor | foldable_clamshelllead | bar |
Display
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 "lead | 6.77 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 413 ppilead | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nits | 3000 nits |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 45 W | 50 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 Wlead | 0 W |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 3 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Razr 50 Ultra or Phone (3a) Pro?+
Phone (3a) Pro has 25.0% more battery — 4000 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
Which is lighter, Razr 50 Ultra or Phone (3a) Pro?+
Razr 50 Ultra is 22g lighter — 189g vs 211g.
Is Razr 50 Ultra waterproof?+
Razr 50 Ultra has an IPX8 rating.
Does Phone (3a) Pro support 5G?+
Yes, Phone (3a) Pro supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, Razr 50 Ultra or Phone (3a) Pro?+
Phone (3a) Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.