Between the Razr 50 Ultra and X200, the Razr 50 Ultra comes out ahead in refresh rate / weight, while the X200 wins on wired charging / wireless charging. Overall, the Razr 50 Ultra scores 65.6 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 edges ahead on the Mars Score (65.6 vs 71.7), but the 6.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Razr 50 Ultra if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, weight, screen size, among others.
Pick the X200 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wired charging, wireless charging, antutu, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, 5g support, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 13.00 g less. 189 vs 202.
- ▲Screen size — 3.45% more. 6.9 " vs 6.67 ".
- ▲Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP68).
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲Wired charging — 100.00% more. 90 W vs 45 W.
- ▲Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 30 W vs 15 W.
- ▲AnTuTu — 62.73% more. 2620000 vs 1610000.
- ▲Battery capacity — 45.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
- ▲Pixel density — 11.38% more. 460 ppi vs 413 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 glead | 202 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mmlead | 8.0 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX8lead | IP68 |
| Form factor | foldable_clamshelllead | bar |
Display
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 "lead | 6.67 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 413 ppi | 460 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4000 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 45 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 4 yearslead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Razr 50 Ultra or X200?+
X200 has 45.0% more battery — 4000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, Razr 50 Ultra or X200?+
Razr 50 Ultra is 13g lighter — 189g vs 202g.
Is Razr 50 Ultra waterproof?+
Razr 50 Ultra has an IPX8 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, Razr 50 Ultra or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.