Between the Razr 50 Ultra and X200 Pro, the Razr 50 Ultra comes out ahead in refresh rate / weight, while the X200 Pro wins on wired charging / wireless charging. Overall, the Razr 50 Ultra scores 65.6 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Razr 50 Ultra if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, weight, screen size, among others.
Pick the X200 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wired charging, wireless charging, antutu, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, 5g support, front camera, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 34.00 g less. 189 vs 223.
- ▲Screen size — 1.77% more. 6.9 " vs 6.78 ".
- ▲Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP69).
Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins
- ▲Wired charging — 100.00% more. 90 W vs 45 W.
- ▲Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 30 W vs 15 W.
- ▲AnTuTu — 70.19% more. 2740000 vs 1610000.
- ▲Battery capacity — 50.00% more. 6000 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
- ▲RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
- ▲Pixel density — 9.44% more. 452 ppi vs 413 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 glead | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mmlead | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX8lead | IP69 |
| Form factor | foldable_clamshelllead | bar |
Display
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 "lead | 6.78 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 413 ppi | 452 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4000 mAh | 6000 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 45 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 4 yearslead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Razr 50 Ultra or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has 50.0% more battery — 4000 mAh vs 6000 mAh.
Which is lighter, Razr 50 Ultra or X200 Pro?+
Razr 50 Ultra is 34g lighter — 189g vs 223g.
Is Razr 50 Ultra waterproof?+
Razr 50 Ultra has an IPX8 rating.
Does X200 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, Razr 50 Ultra or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, Razr 50 Ultra or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.