Between the Razr 50 and X Fold 3 Pro, the Razr 50 comes out ahead in weight / pixel density, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on wired charging / wireless charging. Overall, the Razr 50 scores 60.2 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X Fold 3 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Razr 50 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density.
Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wired charging, wireless charging, antutu, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X Fold 3 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Motorola - Razr 50 wins
- ▲Weight — 48.00 g less. 188 vs 236.
- ▲Pixel density — 2.74% more. 413 ppi vs 402 ppi.
Why Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro wins
- ▲Wired charging — 300.00% more. 100 W vs 25 W.
- ▲Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 50 W vs 15 W.
- ▲AnTuTu — 165.38% more. 2070000 vs 780000.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Battery capacity — 35.71% more. 5700 mAh vs 4200 mAh.
- ▲Screen size — 16.38% more. 8.03 " vs 6.9 ".
- ▲Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 glead | 236 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mmlead | 11.2 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Form factor | foldable_clamshelllead | foldable_book |
Display
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 " | 8.03 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 413 ppilead | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4200 mAh | 5700 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 25 W | 100 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 50 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 4 yearslead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Razr 50 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has 35.7% more battery — 4200 mAh vs 5700 mAh.
Which is lighter, Razr 50 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
Razr 50 is 48g lighter — 188g vs 236g.
Is Razr 50 waterproof?+
Razr 50 has an IPX8 rating.
Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, Razr 50 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, Razr 50 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.