Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 vs Russell Hobbs - PuriFry
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 9.5 L | 3.5 L |
| Wattage | 2400 W | 1400 W |
| Max temperature | 240 °C | 200 °C |
| Dual zone | true | false |
| Presets | 6 | 7 |
Between the Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 and PuriFry, the Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 comes out ahead in capacity / wattage, while the PuriFry wins on presets. Overall, the Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 scores 78.6 and the PuriFry scores 52.9 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 25.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 if you care most about capacity / wattage. The biggest gaps in its favor are capacity, wattage, max temperature, among others. The single most decisive one: Capacity — 171.43% more. 9.5 L vs 3.5 L.
Pick the PuriFry if you care most about presets. Its strongest claims are presets. The single most decisive one: Presets — 1.00 more. 7 vs 6.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 or Russell Hobbs - PuriFry?
Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 leads the current Mars Score by 25.7 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare capacity, wattage, dual zone, presets against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 if…
Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 has the measurable edge on capacity l, wattage w, max temp c.
Choose Russell Hobbs - PuriFry if…
Russell Hobbs - PuriFry has the measurable edge on preset count.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 wins
- ▲Capacity — 171.43% more. 9.5 L vs 3.5 L.
- ▲Wattage — 71.43% more. 2400 W vs 1400 W.
- ▲Max temperature — 20.00% more. 240 °C vs 200 °C.
- ▲Has Dual zone.
Why Russell Hobbs - PuriFry wins
- ▲Presets — 1.00 more. 7 vs 6.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 9.5 Llead | 3.5 L |
| Dual zone | truelead | false |
Power
| Spec | Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage | 2400 Wlead | 1400 W |
| Max temperature | 240 °Clead | 200 °C |
Features
| Spec | Ninja - Foodi Max Dual Zone AF400 | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry |
|---|---|---|
| Presets | 6 | 7lead |
| Smart app | false | false |
| Dishwasher-safe | true | true |
| Noise | 58 dB | 55 dBlead |