Between the Phone (3) and X200 Pro, the Phone (3) comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X200 Pro wins on wireless charging and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3) scores 68.7 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.7 vs 74), but the 5.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Phone (3) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.
Pick the X200 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, wired charging, antutu, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins
- ▲Weight — 27.00 g less. 196 vs 223.
- ▲Pixel density — 1.77% more. 460 ppi vs 452 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins
- ▲Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 30 W vs 15 W.
- ▲Wired charging — 38.46% more. 90 W vs 65 W.
- ▲AnTuTu — 33.66% more. 2740000 vs 2050000.
- ▲RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
- ▲Battery capacity — 16.50% more. 6000 mAh vs 5150 mAh.
- ▲Screen size — 1.19% more. 6.78 " vs 6.7 ".
- ▲Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 196 glead | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mmlead | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP69lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.7 " | 6.78 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppilead | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5150 mAh | 6000 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 65 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3) | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Phone (3) or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has 16.5% more battery — 5150 mAh vs 6000 mAh.
Which is lighter, Phone (3) or X200 Pro?+
Phone (3) is 27g lighter — 196g vs 223g.
Is Phone (3) waterproof?+
Phone (3) has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, Phone (3) or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, Phone (3) or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.