Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Oppo - Reno 13 Pro vs Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Reno 13 ProOPPORENDER
Probe A
Oppo
Reno 13 Pro
68.3/ 100B
Performance62· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display71· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X Fold 3 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X Fold 3 Pro
73.1/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery71· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Reno 13 Pro and X Fold 3 Pro, the Reno 13 Pro comes out ahead in front camera / weight, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on antutu / ram. Overall, the Reno 13 Pro scores 68.3 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X Fold 3 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.3 vs 73.1), but the 4.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Reno 13 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are front camera, weight, pixel density, among others.

Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, ram, wired charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Oppo - Reno 13 Pro wins

  • Front camera — 56.25% more. 50 MP vs 32 MP.
  • Weight — 41.00 g less. 195 vs 236.
  • Pixel density — 12.69% more. 453 ppi vs 402 ppi.
  • Battery capacity — 1.75% more. 5800 mAh vs 5700 mAh.

Why Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro wins

  • AnTuTu — 44.76% more. 2070000 vs 1430000.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Wired charging — 25.00% more. 100 W vs 80 W.
  • Screen size — 17.57% more. 8.03 " vs 6.83 ".
  • Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP68).
  • Wireless charging: 50 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Weight195 glead236 g
Thickness7.55 mmlead11.2 mm
Water resistanceIP68IPX8lead
Form factorbarfoldable_booklead

Display

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Screen size6.83 "8.03 "lead
Pixel density453 ppilead402 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1200 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X Fold 3 Pro
RAM12 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu14300002070000lead
CPU total clock15.4 GHz21.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera50 MPlead32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Battery capacity5800 mAhlead5700 mAh
Wired charging80 W100 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W50 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X Fold 3 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecOppo - Reno 13 ProVivo - X Fold 3 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Reno 13 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro has 1.8% more battery — 5800 mAh vs 5700 mAh.

Which is lighter, Reno 13 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+

Reno 13 Pro is 41g lighter — 195g vs 236g.

Is Reno 13 Pro waterproof?+

Reno 13 Pro has an IP68 rating.

Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Reno 13 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Reno 13 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.