Between the UHZ65UST and MoGo 3 Pro, the UHZ65UST comes out ahead in brightness and resolution, while the MoGo 3 Pro wins on several specs. Overall, the UHZ65UST scores 87.6 and the MoGo 3 Pro scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UHZ65UST is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 52.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the UHZ65UST if you care most about brightness and resolution. The biggest gaps in its favor are brightness, resolution, light source, among others.
The MoGo 3 Pro similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the UHZ65UST is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Optoma - UHZ65UST wins
- ▲Brightness — 677.78% more. 3500 lm vs 450 lm.
- ▲Resolution: 4K (vs 1080p).
- ▲Light source: Laser (vs LED).
- ▲Short-throw: true (vs false).
Why XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | Optoma - UHZ65UST | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1080p |
| Brightness | 3500 lmlead | 450 lm |
| Contrast | 2500000:1 | 1500:1 |
| Light source | Laserlead | LED |
| Short-throw | truelead | false |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | Optoma - UHZ65UST | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | None | Google TV |
| HDMI inputs | 3lead | 1 |
| Built-in speakers | true | true |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.