Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL vs Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6.2 L | 4.2 L |
| Wattage | 2000 W | 1550 W |
| Presets | 13 | 9 |
Between the Airfryer 3000 Series XL and Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827, the Airfryer 3000 Series XL comes out ahead in capacity / wattage, while the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins on several specs. Overall, the Airfryer 3000 Series XL scores 62.8 and the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 scores 55.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Airfryer 3000 Series XL edges ahead on the Mars Score (62.8 vs 55.5), but the 7.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Airfryer 3000 Series XL if you care most about capacity / wattage. The biggest gaps in its favor are capacity, wattage, presets. The single most decisive one: Capacity — 47.62% more. 6.2 L vs 4.2 L.
The Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable dual zone, max temperature, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Airfryer 3000 Series XL is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL or Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827?
Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL leads the current Mars Score by 7.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare capacity, wattage, presets against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL if…
Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL has the measurable edge on capacity l, wattage w, preset count.
Choose Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 if…
Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL wins
- ▲Capacity — 47.62% more. 6.2 L vs 4.2 L.
- ▲Wattage — 29.03% more. 2000 W vs 1550 W.
- ▲Presets — 4.00 more. 13 vs 9.
Why Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6.2 Llead | 4.2 L |
| Dual zone | false | false |
Power
| Spec | Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage | 2000 Wlead | 1550 W |
| Max temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
Features
| Spec | Philips - Airfryer 3000 Series XL | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Presets | 13lead | 9 |
| Smart app | truelead | false |
| Dishwasher-safe | true | true |
| Noise | 56 dBlead | 58 dB |