vsMars
Trio · Frente a frente

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)

Última atualização 1 de jun. de 2026
ROG Swift PG39WCDMASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
ROG Swift PG39WCDM
79.8/ 100A
Open profile →
UltraGear 45GX950A-BLGRENDER
Probe B
LG
UltraGear 45GX950A-B
83.8/ 100A
Open profile →
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe C
Samsung
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
89.0/ 100S
Open profile →
Veredicto rápido

Across ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM, LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B, and Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) takes the highest Mars Score (89.0), followed by LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B (83.8) and ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM (79.8). See the full readout below.

Pick the Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if you want the highest-scoring choice on raw spec strength. The 5.2-point gap to the runner-up is wide — the chart-topper is the safer default.

Pick the LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B when you want the spec advantages it carries over the leader (look at the per-product breakdown below).

Pick the ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM if its specific spec advantages line up; the score gap to the runner-up is small enough that this is a legitimate value play.

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM
Performance84· 45%
Panel75· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B
Performance81· 45%
Panel87· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Performance84· 45%
Panel95· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Ficha completa

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecROG Swift PG39WCDMUltraGear 45GX950A-BOdyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Screen sizeⓘ39 "45 "49 "
Panel typeⓘQD-OLEDOLEDQD-OLED
Resolutionⓘ1440p5K5K
Aspect ratioⓘ21:921:932:9
Curvedⓘtruetruetrue

Performance

SpecROG Swift PG39WCDMUltraGear 45GX950A-BOdyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Refresh rateⓘ240 Hz165 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.03 ms0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightnessⓘ1300 nits1300 nits1000 nits
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ99 %98.5 %99 %
HDRⓘtruetruetrue
G-Syncⓘtruetruefalse
FreeSyncⓘtruetruetrue

Connectivity

SpecROG Swift PG39WCDMUltraGear 45GX950A-BOdyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
HDMI ports221
DisplayPort ports111
USB-C inputtruetruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ90 W90 W65 W
KVMtruetruetrue
Em detalhe

Análises aos pares

Comparação de 2
ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B
Open →
Comparação de 2
ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Open →
Comparação de 2
LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Open →
Perguntas dos leitores

Perguntas frequentes

Qual pontua mais no geral: ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM, LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B ou Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+

Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) pontua mais com 89.0, seguido de LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B (83.8) e ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM (79.8).

Qual é o mais novo entre ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM, LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B e Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)?+

LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B é o mais recente, lançado em 2025-04-22.

Qual tem a maior taxa de atualização: Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ou LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B?+

Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) atualiza a 240Hz contra 165Hz.

Qual tem o menor tempo de resposta: Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ou LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B?+

LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B responde em 0.03ms contra 0.03ms.

O Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ou o LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B têm USB-C com Power Delivery?+

Ambos oferecem USB-C PD — 65W no Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), 90W no LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B.

Detalhe de spec

Uma spec de cada vez

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→DCI-P3 coverage→

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.