Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 32000 | 26000 |
| Weight | 53 g | 52 g |
Between the X2H Mini and X2V2 Mini, the X2H Mini comes out ahead in max dpi, while the X2V2 Mini wins on weight. Overall, the X2H Mini scores 77 and the X2V2 Mini scores 75.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (77 vs 75.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the X2H Mini if you care most about max dpi. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi. The single most decisive one: Max DPI — 23.08% more. 32000 vs 26000.
Pick the X2V2 Mini if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 1.00 g less. 52 vs 53.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, wireless, buttons, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Pulsar - X2H Mini or Pulsar - X2V2 Mini?
Pulsar - X2H Mini leads the current Mars Score by 1.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max dpi, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Pulsar - X2H Mini if…
Pulsar - X2H Mini has the measurable edge on max dpi.
Choose Pulsar - X2V2 Mini if…
Pulsar - X2V2 Mini has the measurable edge on weight g.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Pulsar - X2H Mini wins
- ▲Max DPI — 23.08% more. 32000 vs 26000.
Why Pulsar - X2V2 Mini wins
- ▲Weight — 1.00 g less. 52 vs 53.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 32000lead | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 750lead | 650 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 53 g | 52 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 70 h | 70 h |