Between the X2H Mini and X2V3, the X2H Mini comes out ahead in weight, while the X2V3 wins on battery. Overall, the X2H Mini scores 88.2 and the X2V3 scores 87.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (88.2 vs 87.8). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the X2H Mini if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight.
Pick the X2V3 if you care most about battery. Its strongest claims are battery.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, polling rate, wireless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Pulsar - X2H Mini wins
- ▲Weight — 2.00 g less. 53 vs 55.
Why Pulsar - X2V3 wins
- ▲Battery — 71.43% more. 120 h vs 70 h.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 32000 | 32000 |
| Max IPS | 750 | 750 |
| Polling rate | 8000 Hz | 8000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 53 glead | 55 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Pulsar - X2H Mini | Pulsar - X2V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 70 h | 120 hlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.