Skip to content
vsMars
Spec drill · 3DMark Time Spy

Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Radeon RX 9060

A side-by-side readout for 3dmark time spy.

AMD · Radeon RX 7700 XT
14800
lead
AMD · Radeon RX 9060
10800
VerdictRadeon RX 7700 XT wins on 3dmark time spy.
Context

Understanding 3dmark time spy

Time Spy renders a fixed scene with tessellation, volumetric lighting, and async compute, then reports a graphics score, a CPU score, and an overall composite.

Score bands (graphics score, desktop)

  • Entry 1080p card: 6,000–9,000
  • 1440p sweet spot: 12,000–18,000
  • 4K-capable: 18,000–25,000
  • Halo (RTX 4090, RX 7900 XTX): 28,000+

Why we use it

  • Cross-vendor (NVIDIA and AMD score on the same scale).
  • Reproducible (locked workload).
  • Maps well to actual 1440p frame rates in modern titles — a 25% Time Spy lead typically translates to a 20–25% in-game lead.

Limitations

It does not include ray tracing (Port Royal does) or upscaling. A card with strong rasterization but weak RT can win Time Spy and lose path-traced Cyberpunk.

This matchupRadeon RX 7700 XT's 14800 is roughly 37% higher than Radeon RX 9060's 10800 (a 4000 gap). Whether that gap is noticeable depends on workload — small percentage gaps rarely change day-to-day experience, while gaps of 20% or more usually do.

Glossary

What is 3dmark time spy score?

A DirectX 12 GPU benchmark from UL Solutions. The composite score is a common shorthand for desktop-class gaming GPU performance at 1440p.

Read the full 3DMark Time Spy score explainer
Drill more

Other specs on this comparison

See the full Graphics Cards category for all products ranked by Mars Score.