Between the Basilisk V3 Pro and EC3-CW, the Basilisk V3 Pro comes out ahead in max dpi and battery, while the EC3-CW wins on weight. Overall, the Basilisk V3 Pro scores 58.4 and the EC3-CW scores 55.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Basilisk V3 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (58.4 vs 55.2), but the 3.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Basilisk V3 Pro if you care most about max dpi and battery. The biggest gaps in its favor are max dpi, battery, buttons.
Pick the EC3-CW if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight.
Both ship with comparable polling rate, wireless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Razer - Basilisk V3 Pro wins
- ▲Max DPI — 837.50% more. 30000 vs 3200.
- ▲Battery — 28.57% more. 90 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Buttons — 6.00 more. 11 vs 5.
Why BenQ - EC3-CW wins
- ▲Weight — 37.00 g less. 75 vs 112.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Razer - Basilisk V3 Pro | BenQ - EC3-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 30000lead | 3200 |
| Max IPS | 750lead | 650 |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 1000 Hz |
Design
| Spec | Razer - Basilisk V3 Pro | BenQ - EC3-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 112 g | 75 glead |
| Buttons | 11lead | 5 |
| Shape | Right-handed | Right-handed |
Connectivity
| Spec | Razer - Basilisk V3 Pro | BenQ - EC3-CW |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 90 hlead | 70 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.