Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Razer - Blade 16 (2025) vs ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Blade 16 (2025)RAZERRENDER
Probe A
Razer
Blade 16 (2025)
76.5/ 100B
Performance61· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display88· 18%
Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)ASUSRENDER
Probe B
ASUS
Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)
63.6/ 100C
Performance54· 35%
Battery & Ports76· 27%
Design· 20%
Display61· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the Blade 16 (2025) and Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025), the Blade 16 (2025) comes out ahead in ram and refresh rate, while the Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) wins on claimed battery life and weight. Overall, the Blade 16 (2025) scores 76.5 and the Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) scores 63.6 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Blade 16 (2025) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Blade 16 (2025) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are ram, refresh rate, battery, among others.

Pick the Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, weight.

Both ship with comparable storage, panel type, backlit keyboard, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Blade 16 (2025) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Razer - Blade 16 (2025) wins

  • RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
  • Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Battery — 20.00% more. 90 Wh vs 75 Wh.
  • CPU cores — 20.00% more. 12 vs 10.
  • Screen size — 14.29% more. 16 " vs 14 ".
  • Thunderbolt ports — 1.00 more. 1 vs 0.

Why ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) wins

  • Claimed battery life — 60.00% more. 16 h vs 10 h.
  • Weight — 0.84 kg less. 1.3 vs 2.14.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecRazer - Blade 16 (2025)ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)
Weight2.14 kg1.3 kglead
Thickness17.4 mm13.9 mmlead
Build materialaluminumaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecRazer - Blade 16 (2025)ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)
Screen size16 "lead14 "
Refresh rate240 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeOLEDOLED

Performance

SpecRazer - Blade 16 (2025)ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)
CPUAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
CPU cores12lead10
GPUNVIDIA RTX 5090 LaptopAMD Radeon 880M
RAM32 GBlead16 GB
Storage1024 GB1024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecRazer - Blade 16 (2025)ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)
Battery90 Whlead75 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h16 hlead
USB-C ports22
Thunderbolt ports1lead0
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, Blade 16 (2025) or Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)?+

Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) claims up to 16 hours — 10h vs 16h.

Which is lighter, Blade 16 (2025) or Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)?+

Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) is lighter at 1.3 kg vs 2.14 kg.

Which has more RAM, Blade 16 (2025) or Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)?+

Blade 16 (2025) offers 32GB of RAM.

Which has an OLED display, Blade 16 (2025) or Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)?+

Both have OLED displays.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.