Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry vs Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40 min | 60 min |
| Dustbin | 0.85 L | 0.7 L |
| Suction (AW) | 170 | 175 |
| Weight | 4.5 kg | 3.5 kg |
Between the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry comes out ahead in dustbin, while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on battery / suction (aw). Overall, the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry scores 72.1 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Cordless Pro IZ862H edges ahead on the Mars Score (72.1 vs 75.6), but the 3.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry if you care most about dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are dustbin. The single most decisive one: Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are battery, suction (aw), weight. The single most decisive one: Battery — 50.00% more. 60 min vs 40 min.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry or Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H?
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H leads the current Mars Score by 3.5 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), battery, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry if…
Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry has the measurable edge on dustbin l.
Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H has the measurable edge on battery min, suction aw, weight kg.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry wins
- ▲Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Battery — 50.00% more. 60 min vs 40 min.
- ▲Suction (AW) — 2.94% more. 175 vs 170.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 kg less. 3.5 vs 4.5.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 170 | 175lead |
| Dustbin | 0.85 Llead | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wet/dry cordlesslead | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 4.5 kg | 3.5 kglead |
| Battery | 40 min | 60 minlead |