Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Roborock - Qrevo Master | Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Suction | 10000 Pa | 3000 Pa |
| Battery life | 180 min | 120 min |
| Water tank | 250 ml | 180 ml |
| AI obstacle avoidance | true | false |
| Noise | 64 dB | 65 dB |
Between the Qrevo Master and Robot Vacuum Pro, the Qrevo Master comes out ahead in suction / battery life, while the Robot Vacuum Pro wins on several specs. Overall, the Qrevo Master scores 81.3 and the Robot Vacuum Pro scores 74.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Qrevo Master edges ahead on the Mars Score (81.3 vs 74.1), but the 7.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Qrevo Master if you care most about suction / battery life. The biggest gaps in its favor are suction, battery life, water tank, among others. The single most decisive one: Suction — 233.33% more. 10000 Pa vs 3000 Pa.
The Robot Vacuum Pro similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable mopping, lidar, self-empty base, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Qrevo Master is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Roborock - Qrevo Master or Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro?
Roborock - Qrevo Master leads the current Mars Score by 7.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction, battery life against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Roborock - Qrevo Master if…
Roborock - Qrevo Master has the measurable edge on suction pa, battery life min, water tank capacity ml.
Choose Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro if…
Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Roborock - Qrevo Master wins
- ▲Suction — 233.33% more. 10000 Pa vs 3000 Pa.
- ▲Battery life — 50.00% more. 180 min vs 120 min.
- ▲Water tank — 38.89% more. 250 ml vs 180 ml.
- ▲Has AI obstacle avoidance.
- ▲Noise — 1.00 dB less. 64 vs 65.
Why Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Cleaning
| Spec | Roborock - Qrevo Master | Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Suction | 10000 Palead | 3000 Pa |
| Mopping | true | true |
| Water tank | 250 mllead | 180 ml |
| Dustbin | 300 ml | 350 mllead |
| Carpet detection | true | true |
Navigation
| Spec | Roborock - Qrevo Master | Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Lidar | true | true |
| Camera navigation | true | true |
| AI obstacle avoidance | truelead | false |
| Max climb | 25 mmlead | 18 mm |
Autonomy
| Spec | Roborock - Qrevo Master | Wyze - Robot Vacuum Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 180 minlead | 120 min |
| Self-empty base | true | true |
| Self-wash mop | truelead | false |
| Self-dry mop | truelead | false |
| Noise | 64 dBlead | 65 dB |
Frequently asked
Which has stronger suction, Qrevo Master or Robot Vacuum Pro?+
Qrevo Master delivers 10000 Pa vs 3000 Pa.
Do Qrevo Master or Robot Vacuum Pro mop?+
Both can mop.
Which has a self-emptying base, Qrevo Master or Robot Vacuum Pro?+
Both ship with a self-emptying base.