Russell Hobbs - PuriFry vs Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3.5 L | 4.2 L |
| Wattage | 1400 W | 1550 W |
| Presets | 7 | 9 |
Between the PuriFry and Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827, the PuriFry comes out ahead in several specs, while the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins on capacity / wattage. Overall, the PuriFry scores 52.9 and the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 scores 55.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (52.9 vs 55.5). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
The PuriFry does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 if you care most about capacity / wattage. Its strongest claims are capacity, wattage, presets. The single most decisive one: Capacity — 20.00% more. 4.2 L vs 3.5 L.
Both ship with comparable dual zone, max temperature, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Russell Hobbs - PuriFry or Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827?
Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 leads the current Mars Score by 2.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare capacity, wattage, presets against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Russell Hobbs - PuriFry if…
Russell Hobbs - PuriFry does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 if…
Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 has the measurable edge on capacity l, wattage w, preset count.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Russell Hobbs - PuriFry wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 wins
- ▲Capacity — 20.00% more. 4.2 L vs 3.5 L.
- ▲Wattage — 10.71% more. 1550 W vs 1400 W.
- ▲Presets — 2.00 more. 9 vs 7.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3.5 L | 4.2 Llead |
| Dual zone | false | false |
Power
| Spec | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage | 1400 W | 1550 Wlead |
| Max temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
Features
| Spec | Russell Hobbs - PuriFry | Tefal - Easy Fry 9-in-1 FW501827 |
|---|---|---|
| Presets | 7 | 9lead |
| Smart app | false | false |
| Dishwasher-safe | true | true |
| Noise | 55 dBlead | 58 dB |