Samsung - Jet 75 Complete vs Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Samsung - Jet 75 Complete | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 200 | 170 |
| Dustbin | 0.8 L | 0.7 L |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 3.7 kg |
Between the Jet 75 Complete and Detect Pro Cordless IW1511, the Jet 75 Complete comes out ahead in suction (aw) / dustbin, while the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins on several specs. Overall, the Jet 75 Complete scores 80.8 and the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 74.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Jet 75 Complete edges ahead on the Mars Score (80.8 vs 74.4), but the 6.4-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Jet 75 Complete if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw), dustbin, weight. The single most decisive one: Suction (AW) — 17.65% more. 200 vs 170.
The Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable battery, cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Jet 75 Complete is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Samsung - Jet 75 Complete or Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511?
Samsung - Jet 75 Complete leads the current Mars Score by 6.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Samsung - Jet 75 Complete if…
Samsung - Jet 75 Complete has the measurable edge on suction aw, dustbin l, weight kg.
Choose Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if…
Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Samsung - Jet 75 Complete wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 17.65% more. 200 vs 170.
- ▲Dustbin — 14.29% more. 0.8 L vs 0.7 L.
- ▲Weight — 0.90 kg less. 2.8 vs 3.7.
Why Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Samsung - Jet 75 Complete | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 200lead | 170 |
| Dustbin | 0.8 Llead | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Samsung - Jet 75 Complete | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 2.8 kglead | 3.7 kg |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |