Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB | WD - Blue SN5000 2TB |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential read | 2000 MB/s | 5500 MB/s |
| Sequential write | 1950 MB/s | 5000 MB/s |
| Endurance (TBW) | 1200 | 900 |
| Interface | USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Between the T9 Portable 2TB and Blue SN5000 2TB, the T9 Portable 2TB comes out ahead in endurance (tbw) / interface, while the Blue SN5000 2TB wins on sequential read / sequential write. Overall, the T9 Portable 2TB scores 64.1 and the Blue SN5000 2TB scores 65 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (64.1 vs 65). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the T9 Portable 2TB if you care most about endurance (tbw) / interface. The biggest gaps in its favor are endurance (tbw), interface. The single most decisive one: Endurance (TBW) — 33.33% more. 1200 vs 900.
Pick the Blue SN5000 2TB if you care most about sequential read / sequential write. Its strongest claims are sequential read, sequential write. The single most decisive one: Sequential read — 175.00% more. 5500 MB/s vs 2000 MB/s.
Both ship with comparable capacity, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB or WD - Blue SN5000 2TB?
WD - Blue SN5000 2TB leads the current Mars Score by 0.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare sequential read, sequential write, interface against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB if…
Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB has the measurable edge on tbw, interface.
Choose WD - Blue SN5000 2TB if…
WD - Blue SN5000 2TB has the measurable edge on read mbps, write mbps.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB wins
- ▲Endurance (TBW) — 33.33% more. 1200 vs 900.
- ▲Interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (vs PCIe 4.0 x4).
Why WD - Blue SN5000 2TB wins
- ▲Sequential read — 175.00% more. 5500 MB/s vs 2000 MB/s.
- ▲Sequential write — 156.41% more. 5000 MB/s vs 1950 MB/s.
Spec comparison
Capacity
| Spec | Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB | WD - Blue SN5000 2TB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2000 GB | 2000 GB |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB | WD - Blue SN5000 2TB |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential read | 2000 MB/s | 5500 MB/slead |
| Sequential write | 1950 MB/s | 5000 MB/slead |
| Interface | USB 3.2 Gen 2x2lead | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Form factor | Portable USBlead | M.2 2280 |
Endurance
| Spec | Samsung - T9 Portable 2TB | WD - Blue SN5000 2TB |
|---|---|---|
| Endurance (TBW)ⓘ | 1200lead | 900 |
| Warranty | 5 yrs | 5 yrs |