Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Sennheiser - IE 200 | Sony - IER-Z1R |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance | 18 Ω | 40 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 119 dB | 103 dB |
| Driver count | 1 | 3 |
Between the IE 200 and IER-Z1R, the IE 200 comes out ahead in impedance / sensitivity, while the IER-Z1R wins on driver count. Overall, the IE 200 scores 62.5 and the IER-Z1R scores 50.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The IE 200 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the IE 200 if you care most about impedance / sensitivity. The biggest gaps in its favor are impedance, sensitivity. The single most decisive one: Impedance — 22.00 Ω less. 18 vs 40.
Pick the IER-Z1R if you care most about driver count. Its strongest claims are driver count. The single most decisive one: Driver count — 2.00 more. 3 vs 1.
Both ship with comparable detachable cable, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the IE 200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Sennheiser - IE 200 or Sony - IER-Z1R?
Sennheiser - IE 200 leads the current Mars Score by 12.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare driver count, impedance, sensitivity against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Sennheiser - IE 200 if…
Sennheiser - IE 200 has the measurable edge on impedance ohm, sensitivity db.
Choose Sony - IER-Z1R if…
Sony - IER-Z1R has the measurable edge on driver count.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Sennheiser - IE 200 wins
- ▲Impedance — 22.00 Ω less. 18 vs 40.
- ▲Sensitivity — 15.53% more. 119 dB vs 103 dB.
Why Sony - IER-Z1R wins
- ▲Driver count — 2.00 more. 3 vs 1.
Spec comparison
Drivers
| Spec | Sennheiser - IE 200 | Sony - IER-Z1R |
|---|---|---|
| Driver count | 1 | 3lead |
| Driver types | Dynamic | 2 Dynamic + 1 Balanced Armature |
| Impedanceⓘ | 18 Ωlead | 40 Ω |
| Sensitivityⓘ | 119 dBlead | 103 dB |
Build
| Spec | Sennheiser - IE 200 | Sony - IER-Z1R |
|---|---|---|
| Detachable cable | true | true |
| Connector | MMCX | MMCX |