Between the IE 900 and AONIC 5, the IE 900 comes out ahead in impedance / sensitivity, while the AONIC 5 wins on driver count. Overall, the IE 900 scores 66.4 and the AONIC 5 scores 66.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes; the decision sits on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
Pick the IE 900 if you care most about impedance / sensitivity. The biggest gaps in its favor are impedance, sensitivity.
Pick the AONIC 5 if you care most about driver count. Its strongest claims are driver count.
Both ship with comparable detachable cable, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Sennheiser - IE 900 wins
- ▲Impedance — 20.00 Ω less. 16 vs 36.
- ▲Sensitivity — 3.36% more. 123 dB vs 119 dB.
Why Shure - AONIC 5 wins
- ▲Driver count — 2.00 more. 3 vs 1.
Spec comparison
Drivers
| Spec | Sennheiser - IE 900 | Shure - AONIC 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Driver count | 1 | 3lead |
| Driver types | Dynamic (X3R) | Triple Balanced Armature |
| Impedanceⓘ | 16 Ωlead | 36 Ω |
| Sensitivityⓘ | 123 dBlead | 119 dB |
Build
| Spec | Sennheiser - IE 900 | Shure - AONIC 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Detachable cable | true | true |
| Connector | MMCX | MMCX |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.