Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175 | 170 |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 3.7 kg |
Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Detect Pro Cordless IW1511, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in suction (aw) / weight, while the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins on several specs. Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 and the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 74.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 74.4). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw), weight. The single most decisive one: Suction (AW) — 2.94% more. 175 vs 170.
The Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable battery, dustbin, cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H or Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511?
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H leads the current Mars Score by 1.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H has the measurable edge on suction aw, weight kg.
Choose Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if…
Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 2.94% more. 175 vs 170.
- ▲Weight — 0.20 kg less. 3.5 vs 3.7.
Why Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175lead | 170 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kglead | 3.7 kg |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |