Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175 | 150 |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 3.6 kg |
Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Stratos Cordless IZ862H, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in suction (aw) / weight, while the Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins on several specs. Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 and the Stratos Cordless IZ862H scores 72 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Cordless Pro IZ862H edges ahead on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 72), but the 3.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw), weight. The single most decisive one: Suction (AW) — 16.67% more. 175 vs 150.
The Stratos Cordless IZ862H similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable battery, dustbin, cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H or Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H?
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H leads the current Mars Score by 3.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H has the measurable edge on suction aw, weight kg.
Choose Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H if…
Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 16.67% more. 175 vs 150.
- ▲Weight — 0.10 kg less. 3.5 vs 3.6.
Why Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175lead | 150 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kglead | 3.6 kg |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |