Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 60 min | 35 min |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.85 L |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 4.5 kg |
Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Floor One S7 Pro, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in battery / weight, while the Floor One S7 Pro wins on dustbin. Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 and the Floor One S7 Pro scores 72.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 72.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight. The single most decisive one: Battery — 71.43% more. 60 min vs 35 min.
Pick the Floor One S7 Pro if you care most about dustbin. Its strongest claims are dustbin. The single most decisive one: Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.
Both ship with comparable suction (aw), cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H or Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro?
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H leads the current Mars Score by 2.8 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare battery, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H has the measurable edge on battery min, weight kg.
Choose Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro if…
Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro has the measurable edge on dustbin l.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Battery — 71.43% more. 60 min vs 35 min.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 kg less. 3.5 vs 4.5.
Why Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro wins
- ▲Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175 | 175 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.85 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Wet/dry cordlesslead |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kglead | 4.5 kg |
| Battery | 60 minlead | 35 min |