Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Cordless Pro IZ862HSHARKILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Shark
Cordless Pro IZ862H
75.6/ 100B
Performance71· 55%
Design81· 45%
Pure One S15 Pro ExtremeTINECOILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Tineco
Pure One S15 Pro Extreme
79.7/ 100A
Performance74· 55%
Design86· 45%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecShark - Cordless Pro IZ862HTineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme
Dustbin0.7 L0.6 L
Battery60 min70 min
Suction (AW)175190
Weight3.5 kg2.7 kg
Quick verdict

Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Pure One S15 Pro Extreme, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in dustbin, while the Pure One S15 Pro Extreme wins on battery / suction (aw). Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 and the Pure One S15 Pro Extreme scores 79.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Pure One S15 Pro Extreme edges ahead on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 79.7), but the 4.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you care most about dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are dustbin. The single most decisive one: Dustbin — 16.67% more. 0.7 L vs 0.6 L.

Pick the Pure One S15 Pro Extreme if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are battery, suction (aw), weight. The single most decisive one: Battery — 16.67% more. 70 min vs 60 min.

Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H or Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme?

Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme leads the current Mars Score by 4.1 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), battery, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…

Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H has the measurable edge on dustbin l.

Choose Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme if…

Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme has the measurable edge on battery min, suction aw, weight kg.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins

  • Dustbin — 16.67% more. 0.7 L vs 0.6 L.

Why Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme wins

  • Battery — 16.67% more. 70 min vs 60 min.
  • Suction (AW) — 8.57% more. 190 vs 175.
  • Weight — 0.80 kg less. 2.7 vs 3.5.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Performance

SpecShark - Cordless Pro IZ862HTineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme
Suction (AW)175190lead
Dustbin0.7 Llead0.6 L
FilterHEPAHEPA

Design

SpecShark - Cordless Pro IZ862HTineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme
TypeCordless stickCordless stick
Cordlesstruetrue
Weight3.5 kg2.7 kglead
Battery60 min70 minlead
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands