Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Tineco - Pure One Station 5
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Pure One Station 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175 | 210 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.6 L |
| Battery | 60 min | 70 min |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 2.85 kg |
Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Pure One Station 5, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in dustbin, while the Pure One Station 5 wins on suction (aw) / battery. Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 75.6 and the Pure One Station 5 scores 81.9 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pure One Station 5 edges ahead on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 81.9), but the 6.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you care most about dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are dustbin. The single most decisive one: Dustbin — 16.67% more. 0.7 L vs 0.6 L.
Pick the Pure One Station 5 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are suction (aw), battery, weight. The single most decisive one: Suction (AW) — 20.00% more. 210 vs 175.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Pure One Station 5 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H or Tineco - Pure One Station 5?
Tineco - Pure One Station 5 leads the current Mars Score by 6.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), battery, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H if…
Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H has the measurable edge on dustbin l.
Choose Tineco - Pure One Station 5 if…
Tineco - Pure One Station 5 has the measurable edge on suction aw, battery min, weight kg.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Dustbin — 16.67% more. 0.7 L vs 0.6 L.
Why Tineco - Pure One Station 5 wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 20.00% more. 210 vs 175.
- ▲Battery — 16.67% more. 70 min vs 60 min.
- ▲Weight — 0.65 kg less. 2.85 vs 3.5.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Pure One Station 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175 | 210lead |
| Dustbin | 0.7 Llead | 0.6 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Pure One Station 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 2.85 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 70 minlead |