Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 vs Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H
Between the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 and Stratos Cordless IZ862H, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 comes out ahead in suction (aw), while the Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins on weight. Overall, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 69.5 and the Stratos Cordless IZ862H scores 64.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.5 vs 64.6), but the 4.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if you care most about suction (aw). The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw).
Pick the Stratos Cordless IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight.
Both ship with comparable battery, dustbin, cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 13.33% more. 170 vs 150.
Why Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins
- ▲Weight — 0.10 kg less. 3.6 vs 3.7.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 170lead | 150 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 3.6 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.