Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 vs Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 170 | 150 |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 3.6 kg |
Between the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 and Stratos Cordless IZ862H, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 comes out ahead in suction (aw), while the Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins on weight. Overall, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 74.4 and the Stratos Cordless IZ862H scores 72 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (74.4 vs 72). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if you care most about suction (aw). The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw). The single most decisive one: Suction (AW) — 13.33% more. 170 vs 150.
Pick the Stratos Cordless IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 0.10 kg less. 3.6 vs 3.7.
Both ship with comparable battery, dustbin, cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 or Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H?
Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 leads the current Mars Score by 2.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if…
Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 has the measurable edge on suction aw.
Choose Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H if…
Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H has the measurable edge on weight kg.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 13.33% more. 170 vs 150.
Why Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins
- ▲Weight — 0.10 kg less. 3.6 vs 3.7.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 170lead | 150 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 3.6 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |