Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 vs Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Detect Pro Cordless IW1511SHARKILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Shark
Detect Pro Cordless IW1511
74.4/ 100B
Performance70· 55%
Design80· 45%
Floor One S7 ProTINECOILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Tineco
Floor One S7 Pro
72.8/ 100B
Performance71· 55%
Design75· 45%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecShark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro
Battery60 min35 min
Dustbin0.7 L0.85 L
Suction (AW)170175
Weight3.7 kg4.5 kg
Quick verdict

Between the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 and Floor One S7 Pro, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 comes out ahead in battery / weight, while the Floor One S7 Pro wins on dustbin / suction (aw). Overall, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 74.4 and the Floor One S7 Pro scores 72.8 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (74.4 vs 72.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight. The single most decisive one: Battery — 71.43% more. 60 min vs 35 min.

Pick the Floor One S7 Pro if you care most about dustbin / suction (aw). Its strongest claims are dustbin, suction (aw). The single most decisive one: Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.

Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 or Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro?

Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 leads the current Mars Score by 1.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), battery, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if…

Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 has the measurable edge on battery min, weight kg.

Choose Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro if…

Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro has the measurable edge on dustbin l, suction aw.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins

  • Battery — 71.43% more. 60 min vs 35 min.
  • Weight — 0.80 kg less. 3.7 vs 4.5.

Why Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro wins

  • Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.
  • Suction (AW) — 2.94% more. 175 vs 170.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Performance

SpecShark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro
Suction (AW)170175lead
Dustbin0.7 L0.85 Llead
FilterHEPAHEPA

Design

SpecShark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511Tineco - Floor One S7 Pro
TypeCordless stickWet/dry cordlesslead
Cordlesstruetrue
Weight3.7 kglead4.5 kg
Battery60 minlead35 min
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands