Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 vs Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.6 L |
| Battery | 60 min | 70 min |
| Suction (AW) | 170 | 190 |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 2.7 kg |
Between the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 and Pure One S15 Pro Extreme, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 comes out ahead in dustbin, while the Pure One S15 Pro Extreme wins on battery / suction (aw). Overall, the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 scores 74.4 and the Pure One S15 Pro Extreme scores 79.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pure One S15 Pro Extreme edges ahead on the Mars Score (74.4 vs 79.7), but the 5.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if you care most about dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are dustbin. The single most decisive one: Dustbin — 16.67% more. 0.7 L vs 0.6 L.
Pick the Pure One S15 Pro Extreme if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are battery, suction (aw), weight. The single most decisive one: Battery — 16.67% more. 70 min vs 60 min.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Pure One S15 Pro Extreme is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 or Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme?
Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme leads the current Mars Score by 5.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare suction (aw), battery, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 if…
Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 has the measurable edge on dustbin l.
Choose Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme if…
Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme has the measurable edge on battery min, suction aw, weight kg.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 wins
- ▲Dustbin — 16.67% more. 0.7 L vs 0.6 L.
Why Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme wins
- ▲Battery — 16.67% more. 70 min vs 60 min.
- ▲Suction (AW) — 11.76% more. 190 vs 170.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 kg less. 2.7 vs 3.7.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 170 | 190lead |
| Dustbin | 0.7 Llead | 0.6 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Detect Pro Cordless IW1511 | Tineco - Pure One S15 Pro Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 2.7 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 70 minlead |