Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | ViewSonic - X2-4K | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Brightness | 2900 lm | 450 lm |
| Resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Short-throw | true | false |
Between the X2-4K and MoGo 3 Pro, the X2-4K comes out ahead in brightness / resolution, while the MoGo 3 Pro wins on several specs. Overall, the X2-4K scores 73.5 and the MoGo 3 Pro scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2-4K is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 38.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the X2-4K if you care most about brightness / resolution. The biggest gaps in its favor are brightness, resolution, light source, among others. The single most decisive one: Brightness — 544.44% more. 2900 lm vs 450 lm.
The MoGo 3 Pro similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the X2-4K is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: ViewSonic - X2-4K or XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro?
ViewSonic - X2-4K leads the current Mars Score by 38.5 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare brightness, resolution, light source, short-throw against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose ViewSonic - X2-4K if…
ViewSonic - X2-4K has the measurable edge on brightness lumens, resolution, light source.
Choose XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro if…
XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why ViewSonic - X2-4K wins
- ▲Brightness — 544.44% more. 2900 lm vs 450 lm.
- ▲Resolution: 4K (vs 1080p).
- ▲Light source: Laser (vs LED).
- ▲Short-throw: true (vs false).
Why XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | ViewSonic - X2-4K | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 4Klead | 1080p |
| Brightnessⓘ | 2900 lmlead | 450 lm |
| Contrast | 3000000:1 | 1500:1 |
| Light source | Laserlead | LED |
| Short-throw | truelead | false |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | ViewSonic - X2-4K | XGIMI - MoGo 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | Google TV | Google TV |
| HDMI inputs | 2lead | 1 |
| Built-in speakers | true | true |